<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PA Notary Blog &#187; notaries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.notary.org/tag/notaries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.notary.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Banks to Pay Five Billion to Settle Foreclosure Investigation</title>
		<link>http://blog.notary.org/2011/05/banks-to-pay-five-billion-to-settle-foreclosure-investigation/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.notary.org/2011/05/banks-to-pay-five-billion-to-settle-foreclosure-investigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 14:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PAN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank regulators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosure investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mega banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robo-signing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.notary.org/?p=1046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal reported on May 11 that mega banks, Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase &#038; Co., Citigroup Inc., and Wells Fargo &#038; Co. have agreed to pay as much as $5 billion to settle deficiences related to the foreclosure process.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.notary.org/2011/05/banks-to-pay-five-billion-to-settle-foreclosure-investigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Robo-Signing Investigation Marches Onward</title>
		<link>http://blog.notary.org/2011/01/robo-signing-investigation-marches-onward/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.notary.org/2011/01/robo-signing-investigation-marches-onward/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PAN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosure affidavits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage servicers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robo-signing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.notary.org/?p=943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The robo-signing scandal, in which mortgage servicers including notaries, were routinely rushing through thousands of foreclosure affidavits without verifying documentation, has led to calls for mortgage reform. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.notary.org/2011/01/robo-signing-investigation-marches-onward/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PAN Gets Social</title>
		<link>http://blog.notary.org/2009/08/pan-joins-facebook-and-twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.notary.org/2009/08/pan-joins-facebook-and-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PAN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAN blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.notary.org/?p=440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We're proud of what we do here at PAN and we want to share our enthusiasm with notaries throughout the Commonwealth. So we're doing a bit of self-promotion through what's known as "social media," reaching out to notaries through our presence on Facebook and Twitter. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.notary.org/2009/08/pan-joins-facebook-and-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Allegheny County Streamlines Notary Commission Process</title>
		<link>http://blog.notary.org/2008/09/allegheny-county-streamlines-notary-commission-process/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.notary.org/2008/09/allegheny-county-streamlines-notary-commission-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PAN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clerk of courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notary applicants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notary commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notary commissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office consolidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prothonotary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recorder of deeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recorder of deeds office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[separate checks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.notary.org/?p=136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If one-stop shopping was the goal, then Allegheny County has achieved what it set out to accomplish with the notary commission process.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.notary.org/2008/09/allegheny-county-streamlines-notary-commission-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legislature Studies URPERA Proposal in Pennsylvania</title>
		<link>http://blog.notary.org/2008/08/legislature-studies-urpera-proposal-in-pennsylvania/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.notary.org/2008/08/legislature-studies-urpera-proposal-in-pennsylvania/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PAN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic signatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic transactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national conference of commissioners on uniform state l]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technological standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uniform law commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uniform standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uniform state laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.notary.org/?p=86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Pennsylvania House of Representatives is studying a proposal to adopt the Uniform Real Property Electronic Recording Act (URPERA).]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.notary.org/2008/08/legislature-studies-urpera-proposal-in-pennsylvania/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

